Some art dazzles. Some art disturbs. And some art just makes you squint and mutter: “You’ve got to be kidding me.”
This is my lovingly judgmental roundup of the art world’s most infamous moments.
These pieces ignited critics, baffled viewers, and made auction houses very rich. They raise the eternal question: Is this art or just exceptionally well-lit trash?
These so-called “masterpieces” run the gamut from creative laziness to conceptual trolling. And yes, the price tags are real.
Sure, many of these works are famous, even market breaking. But let’s be honest folks …
Some are just the equivalent of pranks inflated by hype, hedge funds, and an industry that’s allergic to saying, “This might be ridiculous.”
So, it’s time for some well-earned art world mockery. Below is my official roast gallery of modern art crimes.
It’s a snarky, satirical list of artworks so overhyped, so performatively deep, even the museum guards have stopped pretending.
(No masterpieces were harmed in the making of this list. Just reputations.)
Most Ridiculous Works In Modern Art History
🔴 Jeff Koons – Balloon Dog
📍The Broad, LACMA
💸 One sold for $58.4 million
Art crime: A giant stainless steel balloon animal. That’s it.
👉 Imagine a clown got tenure at Yale and called it a sculpture.
Jeff Koons is the most expensive living artist in the world. He’s built his empire on kitsch, Neo-Pop, and the uncanny ability to keep a straight face while saying outlandish things.
Take his famous Balloon Dogs. They’re akin to gleaming, oversized party favors rendered in polished steel and priced higher than most penthouses.
According to Koons, they represent the “miracle of life.” He once explained, “We’re balloons. You take a breath and inhale—it’s optimism. You exhale, and it’s kind of a symbol of death.”
Deep thoughts from the man who turned mylar into metaphor. Because nothing captures the fragility of existence quite like a 10 foot metallic balloon animal parked in a sculpture garden.
Koons calls it philosophy. The rest of us call it the world’s most expensive party decoration. And somewhere out there, his mother probably is proud.
🔴 Damien Hirst – The Beautiful Paintings
📍Private collections and gallery hell
Art crime: AI-generated designs spun out by assistants and branded with Hirst’s name.
👉 The only thing Hirst painted here is a check.
Hirst is a British artist who’s synonymous with shocking contemporary and conceptual art. He’s most famously known for his dead shark in a tank, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living.
Hirst likes to position himself as a super artists and speaker of deep truths. His latest art stunt, from 2023, are his Beautiful Paintings.
But are they “paintings?” No, they are AI-assisted images. The premise?
Hirst fed prompts into an AI generator to create whirling abstract designs. He then had his assistants paint them (in 5 minutes or less, allegedly).
The point? A cash grab. It allowed Hirst to sell thousands of “originals,” many in limited editions, at up to $30,000 a pop. He described them as part of a “joyful, creative process.”
But the art world didn’t buy it this time. They largely saw them as derivative, mechanized, and a sleazy assembly line.
🔴 Maurizio Cattelan – Comedian
📍Art Basel, eaten on site
💸 Sold for $120,000
Art crime: A banana duct-taped to a wall.
👉 Half sculpture, half potassium deficiency.
In what may be the ultimate metaphor for the modern art world, Maurizio Cattelan duct-taped a banana to a wall and called it Comedian. That’s it.
No symbolism. No irony. Just a Chiquita and a strip of gray tape.
It sold three times for over $100k. Another performance artist peeled it off the wall and ate it in front of a crowd, declaring it a new piece: Hungry Artist.
Cattelan’s response? He shrugged.
Because the banana was … replaceable. The art wasn’t the object. It was the idea of absurdity commodifed.
So, in essence, a banana was sold for the price of a luxury car, got eaten, and everyone nodded solemnly like it was something profound. Critics called it genius. Everyone else called it lunch or saw it for what it was: trolling for dollars.
🔴 Thomas Kinkade – Literally Everything
📍QVC, your aunt’s hallway, purgatory
Art crime: Weaponized nostalgia wrapped in glitter.
👉 It’s like weaponizing a Hallmark card
Kinkade didn’t just paint cottages. He created a franchise of wholesomeness, churning out so many soft-glow cabins and lamplit bridges that one wonders if he ever left the Christmas village.
Every tree sparkles. Every window glows. Every path leads to your aunt’s heart.
The real kicker? He trademarked Painter of Light — the same phrase often used for J.M.W. Turner, one of history’s actual geniuses.
Kinkade’s empire even included themed housing developments and limited edition collectibles with fake scarcity.
Critics called his work kitsch. He called it inspirational. Either way, the guy made millions convincing people they were buying hope in a frame.
🔴 Takashi Murakami – Smiling Flowers That Won’t Leave You Alone
📍Every merch stand from Paris to Tokyo or on a balloon at the Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade.
Art crime: Art, meet brand. Brand, meet exhaustion.
👉 If Lisa Frank became a global art empire with a PhD in marketing.
Throughout his career, Japanese pop artist Takashi Murakami has dazzled the art world with fiberglass figurines, candy-colored characters bearing rows of menacing teeth, and his signature smiling flowers that look like they were genetically engineered.
He coined the term “Superflat.” This is a concept that merges traditional Japanese aesthetics with the shiny, commercial sheen of anime and consumer culture. And, to be fair, it has some critical heft behind it.
But let’s talk about those flowers. Those relentless, rainbow-hued daisies with frozen grins are plastered across canvases, sneakers, and Kanye West albums.
According to Murakami, these seemingly innocent blooms are trauma incarnate. He’s said their unnerving smiles represent repressed emotions stemming from the 1945 atomic bombings. Ah yes, because nothing says post-nuclear psychological reckoning quite like a tote bag.
It’s a bold claim. Possibly too bold. In practice, the flowers have become less a meditation on national grief and more a cheerful wallpaper pattern for streetwear drops or Snapchat filters.
Murakami’s work walks the tightrope between critique and complicity. He says he’s exposing the flattening effects of consumerism while producing exactly the kind of glossy, collectible objects that fuel it. It’s hard to tell if he’s in on the joke or selling it wholesale, which might be the most “superflat” move of all.
🔴 Julian Schnabel – Plate Paintings
📍MoMA, Guggenheim
Art crime: Glued broken plates to canvas and called it postmodern.
👉 Someone let their dinnerware explode and wrote a thesis about it.
Julian Schnabel is a brash American painter and sometime filmmaker. He burst onto the 1980s art scene wielding not just brushes, but shards of broken crockery.
As a leading figure in the Neo-Expressionist movement, Schnabel became (in)famous for his broken plate paintings. They’re canvases layered with smashed porcelain and slathered in paint like some postmodern temper tantrum.
They’re loud, aggressive, and, frankly, exhausting. There’s a peculiar alchemy at work: part retrograde machismo, part bombastic self-importance, and part “look what I can glue to a wall.”
One even depicts Van Gogh. It’s as if Schnabel were trying to commune with greatness by smashing dishes in his honor.
Many of his works feel incoherent, as though he mistook scale for substance and texture for meaning. Despite Schnabel’s towering self-regard, none of his pieces carry the seismic weight of a Pollock drip or a Jasper Johns target.
🔴 Richard Prince – Instagram Portraits
📍Gagosian Gallery
Art crime: He screenshotted other people’s selfies and sold them.
👉 Modern theft, screenshotting rebranded as genius.
Richard Prince built a career on rephotographing other people’s photographs. He proved once and for all that originality is overrated, especially when appropriation comes with a gallery label and a six figure price tag.
His Instagram portraits weren’t edgy or transformative. They were lazy digital looting wrapped in gallery lighting. Prince didn’t ask for permission, offer payment, or even credit the original users.
Instead, he claimed that by simply commenting beneath the photos and printing them out, he had made them his own. “Post-post-modern,” he mumbled. Critics called it “post-ethics.”
The real kicker? These were sold in one of the most prestigious galleries in New York. This prompted many to wonder if the art world had finally eaten itself.
🔴 Koons – Bouquet of Tulips
📍Behind the Petit Palais, Paris
Art crime: An unsolicited “gift” to France, shaped like balloon flowers and placed in a no-man’s-land.
👉 It’s giving Times Square energy in a Rodin world.
This sculpture might win the all-time award for Most Misguided Artistic Tribute. Koons offered Tulips as a “gift” to honor the victims of the November 2015 attacks in Paris.
But instead of solemnity or empathy, Parisians received a towering explosion of glossy chrome. Ostensibly tulips, the sculpture looks suspiciously like a fistful of inflatable anuses spray-painted in Photoshop tones.
Koons claimed it symbolized “the memory of loss, the optimism of the future, and the vitality of the present.” What it actually symbolized, many critics argued, was self-promotion, aesthetic tone-deafness, and the cynical hijacking of grief for branding purposes.
And though the sculpture was a gift, it came with a catch: the French taxpayers still had to pay for its construction and installation. Cue outrage.
In the end, Tulips was quietly exiled to a corner behind the Petit Palais — less a grand public tribute than an embarrassing eyesore the city couldn’t quite regift.
🔴 Kazimir Malevich – White on White
📍MoMA, New York
Art crime: White square on a white canvas.
👉 If your ceiling paint sample became a philosophical manifesto.
Malevich called it the pinnacle of Suprematism. This was his self-named movement that sought to transcend reality through pure geometric form.
But while Black Square felt radical and almost spiritual, White on White just feels … like the spiritual equivalent of white noise.
Was it about infinity? The void? Transcendence? Maybe.
But it also looks like a painter gave up halfway through priming the canvas and called it a “revolution.”
Still, critics hailed it as the “death of painting.” And Malevich, ever the provocateur, happily buried the body himself.
🔴 Pablo Picasso – Ceramics Phase
📍Musée Picasso in Barcelona and shops near you
Art crime: Legendary painter picks up a kiln and says “meh, that’ll do.”
👉 The doodles of a bored genius with too much clay and no one to stop him.
Even the greatest artist of the 20th century wasn’t immune to artistic boredom. Late in life, Picasso traded in his oils and angst for … clay.
Yes, clay. Not for a revolutionary reinvention, but for painting whimsical faces and mythological doodles on French pottery. It was less Blue Period, more Blue Plate Special.
Why the shift? Possibly creative fatigue. Possibly Jacqueline Roque, the charming employee at the ceramics workshop who became his new obsession (and eventual wife).
Naturally, this meant cheating on Françoise Gilot because it wouldn’t be a proper Picasso chapter without romantic betrayal baked in.
The results? Playful, unbothered, and teetering on kitsch.
At the time, critics mostly winced. These weren’t hailed as masterpieces. Nope, they were dismissed as high end souvenir ware, sunny little curios that belonged on a French Riviera patio, not a museum plinth.
Today, of course, they sell for six figures. Because once Picasso touches it, the market canonizes it. Even if it’s just a glorified garden gnome.
🔴 Marcel Duchamp – Fountain
📍Replica, Tate Modern & Centre Pompidou
Art crime: It’s a urinal. That’s it.
👉 Yes, it’s famous. No, it’s not art.
Behold the urinal that launched a thousand thinkpieces.
In 1917, Marcel Duchamp, apparently bored with painting and fully over “retinal pleasure,” submitted a porcelain urinal to an art exhibition. He signed it “R. Mutt,” and called it Fountain.
Critics were horrified. Philosophers were intrigued. Janitors were confused.
Was it a prank? A manifesto? A plumbing emergency? Yes.
Duchamp didn’t sculpt it, didn’t paint it, didn’t even hang it right side up. But Fountain became a defining moment in conceptual art. It was a bold gesture that declared, “Art is whatever I say it is. Even this bathroom fixture.”
Give him some credit: Duchamp threw the art world into a full-blown identity crisis. A century later, we’re still arguing about whether genius begins at the hardware store. But, no, hardware is not art.
🔴 Yoko Ono – Ceiling Painting / Yes Painting
📍Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), New York
Art crime: Ladder to Enlightenment (and Eye Strain)
👉 Congratulations, you just scaled the metaphorical heights of pretension.
Yoko Ono is many things: conceptual artist, avant-garde icon, and high priestess of enigmatic sass. Her 1966 artwork Yes is often hailed as a breakthrough in interactive art. It’s a participatory piece with minimalist flair and maximal interpretive ambition.
The setup? A simple wooden ladder stands beneath a small frame dangling a magnifying glass. The viewer climbs the ladder, grabs the glass, squints upward, and—if their balance and patience hold—spots a single tiny word printed on the ceiling: “yes.”
It’s hopeful. It’s earnest. It’s a metaphor. Probably.
Critics called it a spiritual experience. Ono called it “a piece to bring the sky closer to the people.” Meanwhile, museum goers called it a lawsuit waiting to happen.
And let’s be honest: for all its visionary claims, Yes has all the components of a low-stakes escape room.
Ladder? Check. Optical device? Check. Hidden message? Check. Existential validation? Eh, depends on your mood that day.
John Lennon famously said it was the word “yes” that drew him to Ono. A simple, positive gesture in an art world full of “no,” “meh,” and “this installation contains nudity.” Imagine if Ono had written “maybe” instead. Or worse: “Loading…”
Yes toes the line between transcendence and clever gimmick. It’s conceptual art at its most … conceptual. Which is to say: you’re not sure what happened, but someone probably got a grant for it.
🔴 Roy Lichtenstein – Masterpiece
📍Privately held
💸 sold for $165 million
Art crime: Comic book pastiche with a smug speech bubble.
👉 Pop art? More like pop ego. The title alone should be illegal.
Roy Lichtenstein’s Masterpiece is a comic book fever dream in halftone dots. A woman, all melodramatic eyelashes and speech bubble angst, turns to a square jawed painter and breathlessly proclaims, “Why, Brad darling, this painting is a masterpiece! My, soon you’ll have all of New York clamoring for your work!”
And just like that, the prophecy was fulfilled.
It’s a satire of the art world’s hype machine. Or maybe a blueprint? With this single panel, Lichtenstein managed to both mock and manifest his own fame. The painting is so meta, it should come with its own footnotes and a smug expression.
The real art crime here? Masterpiece is a work that mocks the shallowness of fame while actively cashing in on it. It’s a sly wink that never stops winking.
By naming the painting Masterpiece, Lichtenstein dares you to disagree. And if you do? Well, you’ve clearly missed the point. Or maybe you are the point.
So yes, Brad darling, it’s a masterpiece. Or at least it’s a masterpiece of branding.
🔴 Kevin Abosch – Potato #345 (2010)
📍Private collector’s vault, presumably next to a bag of onions
💸 Sold for $1.1 million
Art crime: A black-and-white photo of a potato. That’s it.
👉 Proof that with the right lighting and a gallery rep, you too can sell groceries as high art.
Kevin Abosch is an Irish conceptual artist and photographer who’s never met a Silicon Valley billionaire he couldn’t flatter or invoice. If there’s one thing tech moguls love more than disrupting democracy, it’s overpaying for things they don’t understand and calling it patronage.
First came Yoko Ono’s Apple—a single green apple on a pedestal that slowly decayed as time passed. Then came Cattelan’s banana, duct-taped to a wall and devoured by performance artists. Now, completing the holy trinity of overpriced produce: Kevin Abosch’s Potato #345.
What is it? It’s a potato. A photograph of a potato. That sold for one million dollars. One million. For a vegetable portrait.
According to Abosch, the humble spud reflects the human condition: “Each one is different, but you know they’re all part of the same species.” Deep. Like a dorm room conversation after two hits of something legal in Amsterdam.
Naturally, after launching this tuber into conceptual art stardom, Abosch is now troubled—troubled!—by his own commodification. He claims his ego is “disengaged” the moment he presses the shutter.
He’s not in it for fame, of course. Or money. Or headlines. He’s in it for the idea. The idea, apparently, being: what if Duchamp, but gluten-free?
🔴 Andy Warhol – Brillo Boxes (1964)
📍MoMA, Norton Simon Museum, Andy Warhol Museum, Berardo Collection Museum
Art crime: Artistic fraudulence, aesthetic laundering, serial impersonation of supermarket packaging.
👉 Guilty of high-concept shoplifting and knowingly distributing imitation cleaning products to the cultural elite.
In this “masterpiece,” Andy Warhol took an ordinary object—a commercial cardboard box used to ship scouring pads—and recreated it in wood. he painted it to look exactly like the original, and placed it in a gallery.
Not just one box, mind you, but dozens of them, stacked like a warehouse sale. It wasn’t pop art. It was pop logistics.
The brilliance, or the gall, was that he didn’t alter it, reinterpret it, or even spoof it. He simply made it again, slightly cleaner, slightly shinier, and let the gallery lighting do the rest. It was a philosophical prank disguised as sculpture.
Critics and collectors swooned. The art world applauded. Everyone clutched their pearls and whispered about Duchamp. Meanwhile, Warhol laughed all the way to the bank. And then probably silk-screened the receipt.
Brillo Boxes was the ultimate art-world con: commodities disguised as commentary on commodities, sold to people who were absolutely in on the joke and still happy to be the punchline. He turned branding into meaning, replication into originality, and capitalism into an aesthetic.
Which is, of course, the most Warhol move of all.
🔴 Ellsworth Kelly – Every Single Color Rectangle Ever
📍MoMA, SFMOMA, Tate Modern, Centre Pompidou, Fondation Louis Vuitton — he’s everywhere
Art crime: Brightly painted monochrome panels hung like the walls are in a hostage situation.
👉 The hill minimalist curators will die on — even though most people walk past and whisper, “That’s it?”
I love abstract art. Truly. I’ll defend a good existential scribble any day of the week.
But even I have my limits. And those limits end right about where Ellsworth Kelly begins.
Kelly is one of the so-called titans of post-war 20th century art. He’s best known for his mural-sized geometric paintings that look like someone hit shuffle on a swatch book.
Critics call him a minimalist visionary. I call him a man who once proudly said his goal was to make a painting with “just five panels of color in a row.” And reader, he did it. Many times.
To be fair, he was an original. He took the radical step of removing all brushwork, texture, and emotion from his work. Instead, he left us with large, flat shapes arranged like an extremely well-behaved kindergarten collage.
At first, the art world scratched its collective head. Then, critics started used words like “reductive,” “meditative,” and “spatial dialogue.”
Critics praised his TV tube hues as “cartwheeling across the canvas.” Though for Kelly, they were divorced from representation, daring you to feel something. Anything.
Look, I’m not saying Ellsworth Kelly isn’t important. I’m just saying that if I accidentally leaned a piece of drywall against a wall in a primary color, I too might be on the verge of a retrospective.
I hope you’ve enjoyed my satirical guide to art crimes. You may enjoy these other art articles:
- famous Andy Warhol artworks
- famous Picasso paintings
- famous Matisse paintings
- famous Chagall paintings
- famous Kahlo paintings
- famous paintings in the United States
- famous paintings in Europe
- famous Baroque paintings
- famous paintings by Leonardo da Vinci
- famous paintings by Raphael
Pin it for later.
